Application of Digital Twin in Industrial Manufacturing
Feb 6, 2020
6 min readAdd to Favourite
Feb 6, 2020
6 min readAdd to Favourite
While the concept of digital twin came into existence in the early 21st century, the technology is expected to reach its tipping point in the next 3–5 years, considering its widespread adoption across the industrial manufacturing domain.
A digital twin is an executable virtual model of physical equipment, which can be continuously updated across the entire lifecycle of the equipment. When the term was first introduced in 2002, the technology was not accepted instantly across the industrial manufacturing domain, due to the inability of the sector to capture, handle, and utilize large datasets.
The successful adoption of digital twin requires the support of key enabling IoT technologies that include reliable sensors, high-speed networks, low-cost data storage, and Big Data analytics. In addition, key technologies related to Industrial 4.0 that includes PLM, CAD, and VR/AR are required for the successful integration of the digital twin.
As a majority of the above-mentioned technologies have reached the optimum level of maturity, the adoption of a digital twin across the industrial manufacturing domain is expected to rise significantly in the next 3–5 years. These technologies combine in several different ways to support digital twin across the industrial manufacturing ecosystem. In addition, the following advancements in technologies are resulting in an increase in the adoption of the digital twin:
According to a survey (refer Exhibit 3) conducted by FutureBridge consisting of 80 respondents from various industrial equipment manufacturing companies worldwide, 45% of the respondents agreed that they already have a digital twin initiative (fully-functional or in-pilot stage) in their manufacturing facility. 35% of respondents concurred that they are planning to introduce the digital twin initiative in the next 3–5 years, with the key driver being the advent of IIoT and Industrial 4.0 technologies in recent years.
According to the survey, most of the companies, who have implemented digital twin, deployed the technology in only one or two manufacturing sites. In those sites, a median of 5–6 people utilized the digital twin software. The allotment of adequate budget remains a key challenge, restraining companies to deploy digital twin across all of their manufacturing facilities. Only 20% of the companies surveyed agreed to have a budget greater than US$ 1 million. However, this is expected to change in the next 3–5 years.
According to FutureBridge, the global investment by industrial manufacturing companies towards digital twin is expected to reach US$ 6.7 billion by 2024, registering a CAGR of 35% from 2019 to 2024. In the last three years, various enterprise technology vendors, including IBM, Oracle, and SAP, have introduced digital twins in their product offerings. Several IoT engineering simulation software providers, including Siemens, PTC, Dassault Systemes, and GE, have made acquisitions to develop a strong digital twin capability.
Digital twin can assist industrial manufacturers in reducing costs, improving customer service, and identifying new revenue-generating opportunities. It is used by manufacturers to add value across all processes of an equipment lifecycle (refer Exhibit 5):
Design: Design engineers can use digital twin in the following ways:
Production: Digital twin can help in production in the following ways:
Operation: Digital twin can help in operation in the following ways:
Maintenance: Digital twin can help in maintenance in the following ways:
Going forward, the digital twin is expected to provide manufacturers real-time data regarding the operating conditions of various components of the equipment. When the equipment is reaching its end-of-life cycle, i.e., it is no longer required by the customer, manufacturers can use digital twin in deciding which component can be re-used, reconditioned, recycled, or scrapped.
For the foreseeable future, no digital twin would be a perfect representation of its physical counterpart. Matching all features of the physical equipment (in terms of physical, thermal, electrical, and chemical), is a costly affair and a challenging task to replicate. Thus, key pointers for manufacturers are:
Share your focus area or question to engage with our Analysts through the Business Objectives service.Submit My Business Objective
Our long-standing clients include some of the worlds leading brands and forward-thinking corporations.